Ianculovici, Clariel / Kaplan, Ilana / Kleinman, Shlomi / Zadik, Yehuda
Page 785 - 786

Maran, Bianca Medeiros / Vochikovski, Laína / Hortkoff, Diego Rafael de Andrade / Stanislawczuk, Rodrigo / Loguercio, Alessandro D. / Reis, Alessandra
Page 788 - 797
Objectives: This split-mouth study assessed the bleaching sensitivity (risk and intensity) and color change after in-office bleaching using a desensitizing-containing (5% potassium nitrate) and a desensitizing-free 35% hydrogen peroxide gel. The null hypothesis was that there would be no differences between study groups regarding bleaching sensitivity.
Method and materials: Sixty patients participated in this split-mouth study. The subjects received desensitizing-containing hydrogen peroxide in half of the maxillary arch, and the other half received a desensitizing-free hydrogen peroxide, defined by random sequence, in two dental bleaching sessions. The bleaching sensitivity was evaluated during bleaching and from 1 h to 48 h after each bleaching session using a visual analog scale and numeric rating scale; the McNemar test, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and the Student-Newman-Keuls test were used for statistical analysis. The color was measured at baseline and 30 days post-bleaching, evaluated with paired t tests (P = .05).
Results: Statistically similar risks of bleaching sensitivity were observed (P = 1.000), but the intensity of bleaching sensitivity was lower (P < .011) on average by 1.32 visual analog scale units in the group bleached with the desensitizer-containing gel during up to 24 h assessment times. No statistical difference in color change was observed between groups (P > .321).
Conclusion: The incorporation of 5% potassium nitrate into in-office bleaching gels does not reduce the risk of bleaching sensitivity, but it reduces its intensity slightly without jeopardizing color change.

Wu, Yu-Chiao / Su, Wen-Song / Mau, Lian-Ping / Cheng, Wan-Chien / Weng, Pei-Wei / Tsai, Yi-Wen Cathy / Su, Chi-Chun / Chiang, Ho-Sheng / Lin, Jarshen / Shieh, Yi-Shing / Huang, Ren-Yeong
Page 798 - 807
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of C-shaped canals in permanent mandibular second molars (SMs) and to determine whether its appearance was associated with the presence of distolingual root (DLR) in permanent mandibular first molars (FMs).
Method and materials: Three hundred and eighty patients were qualified for evaluation of their FMs and SMs using cone beam computed tomography. The prevalence, distribution pattern, external root morphology, and the internal root canal anatomy of the examined molars were recorded and analyzed. Furthermore, the association between the root canal configurations of SMs and the appearance of DLR in FMs was also assessed.
Results: The prevalence of SMs with C-shaped root canals was 44.7%. The most common root canal configuration type of the one-rooted SMs with C-shaped anatomy was C3 (45.6%), followed by C2 and C1. The frequency of C-shaped canals in SMs was 45.4% in Non-DLR group, 52.8% in unilateral DLR group, and 33.9% in bilateral DLR group, respectively. Moreover, the prevalence of C-shaped root canals in SMs with the presence of bilateral DLRs in FMs was significantly lowered.
Conclusion: The association between the presence of DLR in FMs and C-shaped canal configurations in neighboring SMs was surveyed, and the prevalence of C-shaped root canals in SMs with the presence of bilateral DLRs in FMs was found to be significantly lowered.

Kwon, TaeHyun / Wang, Chin-Wei / Salem, Daliah M. / Levin, Liran
Page 810 - 820
Biologic complications around dental implants may be categorized into peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Peri-implant mucositis is defined as reversible inflammation in the peri-implant mucosa without any apparent bone destruction. Peri-implantitis refers to inflammatory process that resulted in destruction of alveolar bone and attachment. Potential etiologic and contributing factors to both diseases are discussed in this review. By targeting and eliminating the etiologic factors nonsurgically as well as surgically, dental implants presenting with peri-implant diseases may be rescued, and then maintained with proper long-term peri-implant supportive therapy. Furthermore, clinical cases and their management are presented to demonstrate the available treatment options. Implant therapy should be carefully planned and executed with consideration of potential etiologic and contributing factors to developing biologic complications. During the initial consideration, patients should be informed of the potential biologic complications in dental implant therapy. Clinicians should monitor implants for any development or recurrence of peri-implant disease to ensure timely therapeutic intervention.

Saini, Amanpreet Kaur / Tewari, Shikha / Narula, Satish Chander / Sharma, Rajinder Kumar / Tanwar, Nishi / Sangwan, Aditi
Page 822 - 837
Objectives: Regeneration of intrabony defects is a challenging target of periodontal therapy. The biologic rationale for regeneration not only is based on incorporating the regenerative material, but also takes into consideration the defect's inherent healing capacity. The present study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of decortication or intramarrow penetration performed with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in the management of intrabony defects.
Method and materials: Forty chronic periodontitis (stage II and III periodontitis) patients having 40 intrabony defects were randomly assigned into test group (intrabony defect filled with DFDBA after intramarrow penetration along with open flap debridement [OFD+IMP+ DFDBA]) and control group (DFDBA along with open flap debridement [OFD+DFDBA]). Primary outcome measures included probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, and percentage bone fill (%BF). All parameters were recorded at baseline, 6 months, and 9 months postsurgical follow-up.
Results: Mean reduction in probing depth and gain in clinical attachment level was statistically significantly higher at the interdental defect site in the test group compared to the control group at 9 months follow-up (P = .02 and .04, respectively). In radiographic parameters, statistically significant improvements in defect depth and gain in defect area were found in the test group (P = .00 and .03, respectively). Statistically significant improvements in %BF and linear bone growth (P = .02 and .00, respectively) were also observed in the experimental group (39.47 ± 13.92% and 1.41 ± 0.54 mm) in comparison with the control group (19.29 ± 14.24%, 0.62 ± 0.49 mm).
Conclusion: Addition of intramarrow penetration with DFDBA in surgical periodontal therapy may enhance the healing potential of periodontal intrabony defects, as observed by greater improvement in clinical and radiographic outcomes.